Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Wolfy 9247

MS: One Halo Game Every Three Years Not Frequent Enough

22 posts in this topic

Article source: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/112/1122586p1.html

ign_masthead_xbox2a.png

For more than the first half of Microsoft's foray into the videogame world, players looked on with interest for years as they waited for the next Halo game to materialize. Recently, with the releases of Halo Wars, Halo 3: ODST and Halo: Reach, that wait has been reduced to 12 months or less. Expect that trend of short waits to continue, though perhaps not necessarily on an annualized pace.

Corporate Vice President for Microsoft Game Studios Phil Spencer told IGN that, "There's no explicit strategy that says we're to ship a Halo game every year. I will say I think one Halo game every three years -- which was kind of our old cadence – is probably not frequent enough."

Spencer noted the long life of the Halo franchise and pointed out that leaving such large gaps in between releases can be detrimental to audience engagement.

"We're coming up on, what, next year is the 10th anniversary. You watch the change in gamers in 10 years. The percentage of players are playing Reach that were I'll say not old enough to play Halo 1 at the time, 10 years is a long time between launches. We definitely think about a more persistent Halo engagement for customers and not going dark for two years, and Live helps obviously with multiplayer to keep people engaged."

"343 Industries is thinking a lot about how to take this franchise and turn it into something that people feel like they have an ongoing relationship with and they can entertain themselves more often. But it's not, hey every November 6 or whatever we have to ship a game and build a production plan around that. We want to do things that make sense as a first party."

Asked if Microsoft took cues from the success Activision has had with its annualized Call of Duty franchise, Spencer had high praise for the mega-publisher.

"I'll just, again, be honest as a gamer. I used to look at annual releases of non-sports games as people just trying to milk me. I figured nobody had enough time to do a good job, and all of the negatives that we would associate with those kinds of scenarios. Kudos to Activision because they've done a good job building a good game, continuing to release each year and I think the fans feel like it's a good thing that they do that. I think there are some things to learn, some positives and some opportunities, in what they do with that. Obviously they've kept the quality extremely high, which I think is important."

"We have some unique challenges and opportunities with Halo because it is a story based game built around a certain set of characters, which is a bit different than what they do with Call of Duty. Not better or worse, it's just different. But watching them and seeing what they do -- we take inspiration from a lot of places -- but obviously they're a big success."

If Microsoft annualized the Halo franchise, would you continue to buy each release? Leave a comment below and let us know your thoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting o.O I think that the call of duty franchise took off a lot better than halo though. Very interesting article though ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interesting o.O I think that the call of duty franchise took off a lot better than halo though. Very interesting article though ;)

Personally i dont like the cod franchise. Infiniward makes the cod games way to fast. MW2 was released not even a year ago and already black ops is on the way. With halo, microsoft actually listens to the fans. They take there time and try to add as much as possible. Like Snipe said though, very interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Naw, I liked COD 2 the best of the whole series, gameplay-wise, I ABSOLUTELY LOVED IT. It was the only thing I would play, and there were no major problems.

Personally i dont like the cod franchise. Infiniward makes the cod games way to fast. MW2 was released not even a year ago and already black ops is on the way. With halo, microsoft actually listens to the fans. They take there time and try to add as much as possible. Like Snipe said though, very interesting.

Not Microsoft, they take the money, bungie listens to the fans, Microsoft takes advantage of the halo series to make as much money as possible, bungie does it for the love of gaming and as a career of course. The cod series needs to be 2 years apart and given more time onto the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardcore Halo nerds would love this until they realized that they were just playing the same game with a new coat of paint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hardcore Halo nerds would love this until they realized that they were just playing the same game with a new coat of paint.

you mean like balck ops?

i dont like this, and when the next halo comes out im going to rent it, not buy it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm buying black ops if it brings back nazi zombies, because that was easily the best thing to come from a CoD game EVER.

I personally don't know what i'd do, but i'd feel pretty cheated if bungie/microsoft bought out a new halo game next year......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason Halo is way better game than COD. (I play & like both of them) is because Bungie puts more time & efforts into their games and actual listens to their fans about the comments on the beta's and updates. I hope Bungie doesn't agree to do this for Microsoft. (Dam you Bill Gates!) lolz :rofl:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really, the longer it takes to produce the game the better it is, I mean odst came out way too fast and was a big rip off. Also MW2 came out too fast and was horrible, the lag online and not being able to find a playable match even the maps and guns. If you are gonna make a game at least put some pride into it and make it enjoyable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0